The thesis, in one paragraph.
Two threads. One record.
Every chamber of evidence on this site lands inside one of these two threads. They are not separate stories. They are the same mechanism — a captured state — visible from two directions.
Genocide of Canadians (UN Convention Art. II)
MAID. Veterans offered death instead of housing. Reserves on their tenth year of boil-water advisories. Indigenous women missing and murdered while inquiries gather dust. Coerced sterilisation. Residential-school graves. A fertility rate collapsed to 1.26. Conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction, in whole or in part.
Canadian funding of an Israeli-tier war pipeline → Ukraine
$13.3B+ committed to Ukraine since February 2022. Meanwhile $229M+ in military goods to Israel during a public "pause." Bill C-233 (restrict arms to Israel) defeated 22–295. CIJA lobbying surged 239% after October 2023. The same defence contractors, the same approval pathway, the same ministers. Public money flowing to active battlefields while public money for housing, water, and care for Canadians is "unaffordable."
The legal frame: UN Convention Article II.
The UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) defines genocide as any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such. Article II lists five elements. Each one of the following links opens a page where Canadian government data is mapped to that element.
The connecting tissue: how a captured state produces both.
The mechanism that lets the Canadian state choose death for its own citizens is the same mechanism that lets it route public money to foreign battlefields while pleading poverty at home. That mechanism has eight observable steps. Each step has its own page on this site.
- Capture. Senior officials accumulate ties to WEF / Brookfield / multinationals before taking elected office; the elected role becomes a tour of duty for those institutions. — Carney conflicts, WEF corridor.
- Lobbying. Registered lobbying communications from CIJA, defence primes, and Big Pharma run into the thousands per year. Surge data shows policy follows the lobbying calendar, not need. — CIJA, Lobbying ledger.
- Appointments. Regulators, tribunals, ombudsmen, Crown corporations and the bench are populated with people whose prior careers were spent inside the institutions they are now meant to police. — Appointments, Judicial councils.
- Policy. MAID expansion, Phoenix, the Bill C-233 defeat, the GAC export pause that wasn't, the Century Initiative 50-million immigration target — all enacted on the lobbying side of the ledger, not the affected-population side. — Bill C-233, Century Initiative, MAID.
- Outcome. The numbers in Article II(a)–(e) above happen. Domestic infrastructure rots. Indigenous reserves stay on boil-water orders. Veterans are offered death.
- Foreign re-spend. Concurrently, Canada commits $13.3B+ to Ukraine, $229M+ to Israeli arms during a "pause," billions in defence procurement to firms with Israeli-tier production lines now feeding the Ukraine theatre. — Canada→Ukraine→Israel funding, Arms pipeline.
- Capture (the press). A $595M media subsidy and Bill C-18 (Online News Act) restructure the press's revenue model around government grants, narrowing the band of voices able to investigate steps 1–6. — Media capture.
- Recovery (the citizen path). Section 504 of the Criminal Code lets any Canadian lay a private information before a justice of the peace. This site exists to make the named-record sufficient for anyone to do that. — File s.504, The 504 Database.
Why the Israeli–Ukraine thread sits inside a genocide dossier.
Two reasons, both legal, both narrow.
First — UN Convention Article II(c) is technology-blind to where the suffering occurs. When a state deliberately inflicts conditions of life calculated to bring about a group's physical destruction, the Convention does not turn on whether the money would otherwise have been spent at home. But it does turn on whether the state had the means and chose otherwise. Documenting that Canada had the means — and chose to fund foreign warfare while domestic life-conditions collapsed — is element-(c) evidence on the same indictment.
Second — Rome Statute Article 25(3)(c) and (d). A person is criminally responsible if they aid, abet, or knowingly contribute to the commission of a crime within the Court's jurisdiction by a group of persons acting with a common purpose. Canadian export-permit decisions, Crown bond purchases, defence procurement awards, and parliamentary votes all leave named records. Those records establish knowledge.
The site does not allege that Canada is the principal in foreign war crimes. It documents that Canada is a knowing supplier and financier, on a public record, while engaged at home in conduct that meets the Convention's definition. Both threads run through the same captured ministries, the same lobbyists, the same named individuals. That is the indictment.
The record is the case. The names are the case. The numbers are the case. Read it like a juror. Then act like one.
How to read this site.
Every page on this site is built to one rule: every claim has a government-of-Canada source, a court record, or a primary published instrument. APA-style citations on every page. No anonymous sources. No paid op-eds. No social-media chatter treated as evidence.
If you only have ten minutes: open government-flow.html. Six flow charts show the legislative pipeline as a circuit diagram — every box is a real bill, every arrow is a documented causal step. The flow is the intent.
If you want the time-axis view: legislative-timeline.html is the same pipeline laid out year by year from 2015 to 2025 — bills passed, bills defeated, and the MAID death-toll bar growing in the right column. The structure is a sequence; the sequence is intent on a calendar.
If you are new, start with genocide-evidence.html — the element-by-element legal map. Then read canada-ukraine-israel-funding.html for the foreign-funding ledger, then return to the sitemap to walk individual chambers. The methodology page explains every sourcing rule the site holds itself to.
If you are a journalist, prosecutor or jurist: start with argument-sources.html — that is the citations bibliography in one document.