Six flow charts. Six legs of the same machine. Each one ends in the same place: 76,475 dead since 2016 under MAID, plus the bodily-and-mental-harm tributaries the same legislative pipeline produces. Below every chart, a short caption naming the bills and the lobbyists. At the bottom, a master diagram showing how the legs interlock.
The MAID expansion pipeline.
Three legislative steps. Two completed, one pending. Each step makes the death pathway accessible to a wider population. The number under each "result" arrow is Health Canada's confirmed cumulative death toll the year that step entered force.
Read it like a circuit: each statute (gold) opens a wider gate to the death pathway (red). Each year of the programme has set a new record. Bill C-7 (2021) was passed after the death toll from C-14 was already public. Mental-illness MAID is delayed, not deleted. — See maid-numbers.html, maid-policy-evolution.html.
The veteran substitution pipeline.
A veteran applies for help. The state takes years to respond. A single VAC employee, sitting on top of the same legal framework as the MAID pipeline, raises death as the alternative. The substitution is documented in the Hansard record by name.
The substitution is the offence. Christine Gauthier (Paralympian) waited five years for a wheelchair ramp; what arrived was a MAID offer. Minister MacAulay confirmed 4–5 such cases referred to the RCMP. The framework that makes the offer legally available is Bill C-7 (Track 2) — the same statute as Flow A. — See veterans-maid.html.
The capture-production loop.
How a captured ministry stays captured. Each loop re-elects the conditions that produced it. Read clockwise.
The loop is self-reinforcing. Step 5 (media subsidy) is the load-bearing link — without press capture, steps 1–4 would face investigation. Bill C-18 (Online News Act) and the $595M subsidy restructured press revenue around government grants. — See carney-conflicts.html, wef-corridor.html, media-capture.html, lobbying-ledger.html.
The foreign re-spend diversion.
How public money that could have funded domestic life-conditions ends up funding a foreign defence pipeline instead. Bill C-233 was the legislative bottleneck where this could have been closed. It was defeated 22–295.
Bill C-233 is the bottleneck the state chose not to close. Had it passed, the Minister would have a statutory duty to refuse export permits in defined IHL-risk circumstances. Defeating it preserved the discretionary loophole. Domestic life-supports stayed unfunded; foreign warfare contracts kept flowing. — See canada-ukraine-israel-funding.html, bill-c233.html, arms-pipeline.html.
The speech-restriction pipeline.
How "they think you're stupid" gets enforced as policy. A four-step legislative cascade narrows what can be said about the apparatus described in Flows A–D.
This is why the dossier exists. Bill C-63 (Online Harms) makes "advocating genocide" a life-sentence offence. Reading that statute in good faith, the question is no longer "can citizens speak about genocide" but "is naming the apparatus protected under the same statute that criminalises advocating it." TENET5's answer: yes — citing primary government sources cannot be advocacy. — See bill-c63-online-harms.html, media-capture.html.
One machine. Five legs.
Each flow above is a leg. Below: how they reinforce each other inside the captured state.
The machine has redundancy. Even if you remove one leg — say, mental-illness MAID is delayed — the other legs continue producing the outcome. To stop it, the capture loop has to be broken. To break the capture loop, the press has to be able to name it. To name it, citizens have to read this kind of diagram and decide whether to file under s.504. — See intent.html for the master thesis.
What the diagrams add up to.
They think we're stupid. They built the machine in the open, on Hansard, in legislation, in lobbying registries, in audit reports, in court filings. They believed nobody would draw it. The diagrams above are the drawings.
If a flow chart shows means + knowledge + recorded choice, the flow chart shows intent. The Convention does not require a smoking-gun memo. It requires the pattern. We have the pattern.
What you can do with this page.
Read each flow until you can re-draw it from memory. Then hand it to one other person — a journalist, a friend, a lawyer, a sitting MP, a juror — and walk them through it. The dossier exists to be passed around. Citizens reading flow charts is what the speech-restriction pipeline (Flow E) is built to prevent.
If, after reading, you decide that reasonable grounds exist that an indictable offence has been committed under the Criminal Code or the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, the citizen pathway is documented at file-504.html.