The element this page anchors.

UN Convention Art. II(a) + II(b)
Killing members of the group, and causing serious bodily or mental harm. The Convention does not require the state's offer of death to be successful for II(b) to be triggered — the offering itself, by an agent of the state, to a person who is asking for care, causes serious mental harm. When the agent is the very ministry charged with delivering that care, the harm is structural. When the offer is repeated by the same agent across multiple veterans, it is no longer an isolated incident; it is a pattern. A pattern by a state agent, on a population defined by their service, mapped to Article II.

The Christine Gauthier testimony — December 2022.

Christine Gauthier is a former Paralympian and a veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces. After her injury, she became paraplegic and began requesting standard accessibility modifications — including a wheelchair ramp to her home — through Veterans Affairs Canada. After five years of requests, on a recorded ACVA committee appearance:

Christine Gauthier — ACVA Committee, December 2022
I have a letter saying that if you're so desperate, madam, we can offer you MAID, medical assistance in dying.
Hansard — House of Commons Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, December 2022 testimony.

The committee record shows multiple members across parties reacting on the floor. The testimony is a verbatim Hansard artifact and is a House of Commons published document.

The ministerial confirmation.

Veterans Affairs Minister Lawrence MacAulay was questioned directly. He confirmed that more than one veteran had been affected and that cases had been referred to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for investigation:

Hon. Lawrence MacAulay — Minister of Veterans Affairs
Cases involving discussions of MAID by a Veterans Affairs Canada employee with veterans have been referred to the RCMP for investigation.
Hansard — Minister's statement before ACVA, December 2022. The committee report records "at least four to five" cases.

The pattern — one VAC employee, multiple veterans.

The ACVA Committee investigation established that the offers were not the work of multiple confused employees acting independently. A single VAC caseworker had raised MAID with multiple veterans across multiple files, all of whom were seeking — not death, but disability accommodations, home modifications, mental-health supports, or other services.

This is a small but exact pattern. Five-plus veterans, one employee, the same conversational substitution: ask for help, receive a referral to die. The Committee called the pattern a "profound breach of trust" and called for systemic safeguards.

5+
veterans confirmed by Minister MacAulay to have had MAID raised by a VAC employee in lieu of services
SRC: ACVA Committee record + Minister's statement
1
single VAC caseworker identified as the locus across the case files (not multiple)
SRC: ACVA Committee Report 2022–23
5 yr
duration of Christine Gauthier's wheelchair-ramp request before MAID was offered to her
SRC: Gauthier ACVA testimony
RCMP
cases referred for criminal investigation at the Minister's direction
SRC: Minister's statement, Hansard

Timeline of the public record.

The systemic context — VAC backlog.

The Gauthier case did not happen in isolation. It happened inside a Veterans Affairs Canada system already documented by the Auditor General as failing on backlog timelines and service standards.

Against that backlog and lapsed-funding background, MAID sat as the single VAC service with the shortest path to execution. The structural pull toward the death pathway is itself the offence.

Why this anchors Article II(a)+(b).

(a) Killing. The state created a programme with the legal authority to kill its own citizens. It then handed access to that programme to caseworkers in the department charged with caring for its veterans. Where the offer is taken up — and Track 2 case data shows disability-supported veterans are statistically over-represented in non-terminal MAID — the state directly causes death.

(b) Bodily and mental harm. The offer alone — by an agent of the state, to a veteran asking for accommodation — causes serious mental harm regardless of whether the veteran takes the offer. The Convention's Article II(b) does not require death. Christine Gauthier described the offer as a continuing injury. So have the other named veterans whose testimony is in the ACVA committee record.

Pattern by a single state employee, repeated, in one ministry, against a defined group (military veterans), over years. That is the Article II intent inference. It does not require finding the employee individually genocidal — it requires finding that the structural conditions the employee operated within made the substitution feasible, frequent, and lawful.

What this is not.

It is not Christine Gauthier's fault. It is not "what if she had just asked nicer." Her testimony is the public record. She is a Paralympian and a serving CAF veteran. The page exists to document what was done to her, not to reframe it.

It is not anti-VAC frontline staff. The vast majority of Veterans Affairs Canada employees do their jobs honestly under impossible conditions. The page documents a single caseworker, a structural backlog, and a ministerial decision-pathway that allowed the substitution.

Pages that connect to this one.

Sources.