How this layer fits. The prior three OSINT layers mapped when accountability bodies changed hands and who was in place at which moments. This layer maps what formal findings those movements sit adjacent to. Every report below is a primary, non-partisan record — already cited by opposition parties, academic researchers, and parliamentary committees. None are original TENET5 claims.

The value of this page is structural: pick any date in the accountability inflection chronology and see which officer findings later named the actors whose tenures changed that day. If the pattern holds, the investigation's thesis is verifiable against sources the investigator doesn't control.

Summary of the record

16
Total findings
4
Formal contraventions
7
Systemic failures
Cost-estimate reports
2017-2026
Time span

Issuing officer / inquiry

Filter by officer:

Chronological findings

Loading primary-source chronology…

Verify against the other OSINT layers

Every finding above lists an inflection-proximate date pointing to the nearest cabinet-shuffle decision point, and implicates specific accountability axes. Use the layers below to triangulate any finding against the other datasets.

Layer 3
Accountability inflections — 7 concentrated shuffle dates
Layer 2
Temporal overlap — when multi-axis actors served concurrently
Layer 1
Methodology — multi-axis actors
Reading guide
60-minute reading path
Methodology note. Each row shows the officer's publication date, the report title, actors explicitly named in the report text, sections of the Conflict of Interest Act or other statute invoked, the finding type, the officer's summary, the observed consequence, the accountability axes implicated, and the nearest cabinet-shuffle inflection date. Where a report found no contravention, the row is kept: establishing what was formally reviewed is evidentiarily valuable. Data source: officer_of_parliament_findings.json (canonical on-site).