The Record

01 — WHAT I REPORTEDThe Disclosure

I identified conduct inside the Canadian Armed Forces that I believed was consistent with foreign interference targeting Canadian soldiers and the mental-health support apparatus. I made a report through channels available to me at the time.

No investigation of the report has been opened. That is a statement of the present status of the record, not an interpretation.

02 — WHAT FOLLOWEDAfter the Disclosure

After the disclosure, the following occurred. Each item is a statement of fact. Inferences and motive attributions are reserved for the s.504 Information, where they are pleaded as allegations, not asserted as findings:

• A family member of mine was killed. That killing has not been treated by the state as a matter connected to what I had reported.
• My sister, pregnant at the time, lost her partner. Her pregnancy was not carried to term.
• The Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) directed investigative attention to me, not to what I had reported.
• A CFNIS officer attended my home. The encounter is documented in the court record.
• A prosecution was initiated against me. That prosecution has continued for six years as of this writing.

03 — THE PROSECUTIONSix Years On

The prosecution has continued for six years as of this writing. The effects, statable as fact rather than framed as argument:

• Legal defence costs have been real and recurring over six years of court appearances and procedural motions.
• Employment has been affected by the existence of outstanding charges.
• The investigation into what I reported has not been opened.

04 — THE EVALUATIONThe Psychiatric Assessment

After the disclosure, I was referred for psychiatric evaluation. Dr. Zoe Selhi produced an assessment. The date of the assessment, and its temporal relationship to the date of the disclosure, is on the record.

Before that assessment, my service record shows: the PPCLI trained me, issued me combat boots, a ballistic helmet, body armour, encrypted radio equipment, and a C7A2 service rifle, then deployed me to Afghanistan to operate signals equipment on active-duty classified signals operations.

The full legal filing states the specific allegations with respect to the assessment: ppcli-lawsuit.html. This page does not reach a finding on those allegations; it states what the record shows.

05 — THE BIGGER PICTUREForeign Interference in Canada Is Real

The Government of Canada itself has acknowledged that foreign interference is a serious and ongoing threat. In 2023:

• The Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference (Hogue Commission) was established to investigate foreign interference in Canadian democratic processes.
• CSIS Director David Vigneault confirmed that foreign states, including the People's Republic of China, have been conducting interference operations on Canadian soil.
• The NSICOP Special Report (2024) identified parliamentarians who had, wittingly or unwittingly, assisted foreign state actors.
• The Government of Canada created the Foreign Interference Commission and passed the Countering Foreign Interference Act (Bill C-70, 2024).

The above items are statements of what the Canadian government has officially acknowledged. In my case, the response to the disclosure I made was not the opening of an investigation but the initiation of a prosecution against me. That is a statement of what happened, not an interpretation of why.

07 — THE SEQUENCEWhat I Experienced, in Order

Stated plainly and in chronological order:

1. I identified conduct I believed consistent with foreign interference.
2. I made a report through channels available to me at the time.
3. I was referred for psychiatric evaluation.
4. No investigation of my report was opened.
5. CFNIS directed investigative attention toward me.
6. A prosecution was initiated against me and has continued for six years.

Items 1–6 are stated as the sequence that occurred. Any further inference — about institutional intent, about what the non-investigation reveals — is a matter for the reader to form, or for a court to rule on. This page does not assert those inferences as findings.

08 — WHAT I AM ASKING FORThree Things

1. An independent investigation into the foreign interference I reported, conducted by an authority with no connection to the Canadian Forces chain of command or the CFNIS.

2. An independent review of my prosecution to determine whether it constitutes a legitimate exercise of prosecutorial discretion or an abuse of process designed to silence a witness.

3. Investigation of the killing. A family member of mine was killed. No state investigation has treated that killing as connected to the disclosure I made. Six years on, no finding has been issued on either matter.

09 — TAKE ACTIONHow You Can Help

10 — CONNECTEDFull Investigation

This account is supported by evidence documented across the TENET-5 platform: