Institution Can Investigate? Can Prosecute? Enforcement Record Dossier
Ethics Commissioner YES NO 0 criminal consequences
RCMP (political crimes) YES YES (via Crown) 0 prosecutions (8 instances)
MPCC (military police) YES NO 0 senior convictions
Procurement Ombudsman YES NO Documents fraud, cannot charge
NSIRA (intelligence) YES (after fact) NO Reviews, cannot direct
CEIPP (elections) Monitor only NO 11 ridings, no intervention
Information Commissioner YES NO Cannot compel cabinet docs
PSIC (whistleblower) YES NO Rarely finds wrongdoing
Auditor General YES NO Documents waste, cannot charge
VISP / VIAP (vaccine injury) Claims intake only NO 7% approval (234 of 3,317); $33.7M admin vs $16.9M paid
Ontario Superior Court (Hartman) N/A (plaintiff must bring claim) NO — struck Anns/Cooper claim "No private law duty of care" (J. Antoniani, 3/2025)
Bill C-70 Registry Registration-based YES (RCMP) 0 registrations, 0 charges

10 oversight bodies. 10 can investigate. 2 can prosecute. 0 have enforced.

The accountability architecture is structurally designed for review without enforcement. Every body can document. None can compel. The result is 185+ pages of documented evidence on this site — and zero criminal consequences for the political class. This is why s.504 private prosecution exists: because the state cannot be relied upon to prosecute itself.

The Full Investigation

Every grade is documented. Ethics Commissioner reports. RCMP statements. MPCC annual reports. AG findings. NSIRA reviews. CEIPP protocol. Information Commissioner annual reports. PSIC case decisions. Bill C-70 registry data. All from official records.