Active Class Actions
Bread Price-Fixing — Class Action
Multiple class actions filed against major grocers and bread producers for the 14-year bread price-fixing conspiracy (2001-2015). Loblaw admitted participation and offered $25 gift cards. Class actions seek substantially more in damages. Check with your provincial court registry for class membership eligibility.
Full investigation →Phoenix Pay System — Class Action
Class actions filed by federal public servants affected by the Phoenix Pay System failures — underpayments, overpayments, and non-payment of wages. Over 150,000 public servants were affected. Multiple law firms involved across provinces.
Full investigation →Emergencies Act — Account Freezing Challenge
Legal challenges related to the freezing of 210+ bank accounts under the Emergencies Act without court orders. The Federal Court ruled the invocation unreasonable (2024 FC 42). Affected individuals may have grounds for damages claims based on the Court's finding of Charter violations.
Full investigation →Potential Class Actions
MAID Track 2 — System Failure Creating Eligibility
The documented pattern where healthcare system failure creates "irremediable" suffering that qualifies patients for MAID Track 2 could form the basis for a class action — particularly for families of patients who received MAID after being denied timely healthcare access. The MAID dossier provides the evidence chain.
Credential Non-Recognition — Immigrant Professionals
Foreign-trained professionals selected through Express Entry who face years-long credential barriers could potentially pursue class action against provincial regulatory bodies for systematic non-recognition of federally-validated qualifications. The credential exploitation data documents the scope.
ArriveCAN — Procurement Fraud
The AG documented significant procurement irregularities in the $59M ArriveCAN contract. Taxpayers who funded the procurement may have standing for a class action seeking recovery of public funds spent on a contract that the AG found problematic.
Full investigation →Section 504 Private Prosecution
Any Person Can Lay an Information Before a Justice
Section 504 of the Criminal Code allows any person to lay an information before a justice, initiating a private prosecution for criminal offences. This bypasses the Crown's refusal to prosecute itself. The justice determines whether there are reasonable grounds to issue process.
Practical Steps
1. Identify the specific Criminal Code offence (e.g., s.122 breach of trust, s.380 fraud, s.268 aggravated assault for MAID violations). 2. Gather evidence documenting the offence (TENET5 pages provide sourced evidence). 3. Draft a sworn information describing the offence, the accused, and the evidence. 4. Present the information to a justice of the peace at your provincial court. 5. The justice reviews and determines whether to issue process. 6. If process is issued, the Crown may intervene — but must provide reasons.
Full s.504 framework →Because the State Won't Prosecute Itself
As documented in the accountability scorecard, 10 oversight bodies can investigate but 0 have enforced. Crown immunity shields the government from liability. Section 504 exists precisely for this situation: when the state will not hold itself accountable, citizens must do it directly.
When Every Other Mechanism Fails
Every accountability mechanism has failed. s.504 and class actions bypass the captured system entirely — pursuing justice directly through the courts.
The evidence across 234 pages is the foundation. This guide provides the starting points. 7 more tools → | Email your MP → | Share the evidence →