01 The Receipts
When your grandfather's generation went to Parliament, their word meant something. They voted on declarations of war knowing their own sons would fight. They debated conscription knowing the cost would be counted in coffins. Every Yea was written in blood. Every Nay was a line in the sand.
Today's Members of Parliament vote on whether the state can kill disabled Canadians — and then go for cocktails. They vote for digital censorship frameworks and call it "safety." They vote to disarm law-abiding citizens and call it "public protection." Then they delete the tweets and pretend it never happened.
It happened. We have the receipts. Every division vote in the House of Commons is recorded in Hansard. Permanent. Public. Unforgeable. The men who went ashore at Juno Beach under the Red Ensign didn't get to hide behind party whips. Neither should these Members of Parliament. Here are their votes — bill by bill, name by name.
02 The Bills — What They Actually Did
Source: Hansard Division Records, ourcommons.ca — Votes 468 (C-21, 3rd Reading)
03 Voices of Accountability
Not all accountability comes from inside Parliament. These independent voices have done more to expose legislative overreach than most sitting MPs. The record speaks for itself.
🎖 David Freiheit (Viva Frei)
Legal Commentator • CPC Candidate (Mount Royal) • Constitutional Rights Advocate
Montreal-based lawyer turned Canada's most prominent legal commentator on government overreach. Freiheit has systematically documented — with legal precision — every constitutional violation embedded in Bills C-21 (Firearms), C-11 (Online Censorship), and C-63 (Online Harms).
On C-21 (Firearms): Freiheit exposed how the "assault-style" definition was deliberately vague enough to encompass hunting rifles, how the Order-in-Council firearms ban bypassed Parliamentary vote entirely, and how legal gun owners were criminalized while illegal smuggling across the US border went unaddressed. His legal breakdowns reached millions of Canadians who would never read Hansard directly.
On C-11 (Online Streaming Act): Documented CRTC's expanded authority over user-generated content, the Heritage Committee testimony contradictions, and how "discoverability" requirements function as state-directed content curation. Hansard confirms every point he raised — the committee simply ignored them.
On C-63 (Online Harms): His legal analysis of the pre-crime provisions — allowing courts to impose house arrest on someone who might commit a hate speech offence — was cited by constitutional law professors across Canada.
Key Contribution: While sitting MPs voted along party lines, Freiheit translated dense legislative text into plain language for millions. He ran for CPC in Mount Royal — directly challenging the Liberal establishment in their Montreal stronghold. Win or lose, the legal record he built is permanent.
Sources: Public legal commentary, LEGISinfo bill text, Hansard committee transcripts, Elections Canada candidate filings
04 How They Voted — MP by MP
| MP Name | Riding | Party | C-14 | C-7 | C-11 | C-21 | C-63 |
|---|
04 Party Breakdown — Who Stood Where
Party lines tell the real story. When a party whips the vote, individual MPs lose their voice. Below is the breakdown for each bill — how each party caucus voted as a bloc, and which members broke ranks.
05 Under the Red Ensign
These are the official records. Every Yea, every Nay, stamped in Hansard and preserved forever. No spin, no interpretation — just the facts of who voted for what, and when.
If your MP voted to let the state kill non-terminal Canadians, that's their record. If they voted for digital censorship under the guise of "Canadian content," that's their record. If they voted to disarm law-abiding Canadians while smuggled weapons flood across the border, that's their record. If they pushed pre-crime speech legislation, that's their record.
The men who signed up in 1939 — who boarded the ships at Halifax under the Red Ensign, who stormed the beaches at Dieppe and Normandy, who fought through the Scheldt and liberated Holland — they didn't get to hide behind party whips. They put their names on the line. They fought for a country where Parliament answered to the people, not the other way around.
Neither should these Members of Parliament.
Montgomery briefed his officers: "Hit them hard, and hit them fast." This page is the briefing. The next election is the battle. Know your MP's record before you mark your ballot.
📄 Source Attribution
- House of Commons Hansard Division Records — ourcommons.ca
- Bill C-14: 42nd Parliament, 1st Session, Vote No. 140 (June 16, 2016)
- Bill C-7: 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session, Vote No. 65 (March 11, 2021)
- Bill C-11: 44th Parliament, 1st Session (June 22, 2022)
- Bill C-21: 44th Parliament, 1st Session (May 18, 2023)
- Bill C-63: 44th Parliament, 1st Session — Died on Order Paper
- Elections Canada MP Registry Data — elections.ca
[CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE]
102 doctors. 373 kills each. These people must be arrested and put on trial immediately to stop further deaths.
Rome Statute. Nuremberg Code. Criminal Code s.504. File charges → | Follow the Money →