The Corruption Territory
Conceptual cartography · 6 domains · elevation = depth of record
Reading the Territory
Each of the six landforms is a domain of institutional failure documented in the public record. The contour rings show how deep that domain runs — more rings, more documented evidence. Colour indicates state: peak red for active crisis, warm amber for sustained pattern, gold for documented concern, sage for emerging record.
The dashed supply lines between territories are not conjecture. They mark where the failures meet: the same MPs who voted for MAID expansion also sit on oversight committees; the same lobbying rosters touch procurement contracts; whistleblower suppression is what turns procurement fraud into s.504 filings.
How to Use the Map
Click any territory to open its detail panel — you get the headline figure, the sources, and direct links into the relevant investigation pages. This map is a hub: from here you can descend into the MAID MP register, the s.504 court filings, the network atlas, or the whistleblower record without navigating through the index.
The elevation is calibrated against the public-record depth. It is not opinion; it is documentary weight. When a territory grows (more charges, more deaths, more evidence), its ring count grows. This map regenerates as the investigation does.
MAID pulls from
maid-accountability.html and maid-exterminators.html
(46 sitting MPs, 76,475 MAID deaths, UN Committee commentary on Track 2).
Oversight references the 271-official / 314-charge sheet
and the $59.5M Auditor General ArriveCAN finding.
Foreign Interference references the Hogue Commission, NSICOP,
and the 2,138 CIJA lobbying-contact count (56% of MPs).
Procurement draws on AG findings and procurement anomaly
scans. Whistleblower references the PSDPA record surfaced in
whistleblower-failures.html. s.504 references
the 17-registry court-filing dispatch in
s504-court-filing.html. Supply lines are drawn where two
territories share at least one named person, entity, or statute in the
underlying data; they are descriptive of the public record, not
accusatory. Seed 118400.